Massachusetts Lottery May Soon Offer DFS. Massachusetts AG Maura Healey, who has used a framework for the regulation of DFS in the Bay State.

The Massachusetts Lottery Commission is proposing sweeping modernization, and has formally stated its intent to adopt online ticket sales, also offering its own daily fantasy sports and social gaming products.

Massachusetts was making noises about adopting a comprehensive online gaming package for quite a while, since it seeks to complement its emergent land-based casino industry and successful lottery product with a more up-to-date and competitive online offering.

While Internet casino gaming and poker would require a huge legislative upheaval, DFS and social video gaming would not ( at the least in the Bay State), plus it’s clear that Massachusetts is intent on creating unique fantasy sports product as a means attracting younger generation that eschews traditional draws, scratch cards and keno in favor of more recent, mobile-friendly styles.

Formal Invitation

As a result, their state has launched a formal obtain information (RFI), inviting companies to submit ‘proposals for the development, implementation, operational support, and maintenance of a Massachusetts Lottery iLottery System,’ read an official statement.

This will include ‘the development and integration of digital versions of existing and new lottery games, including but not restricted to social video gaming and day-to-day dream activities options.’

Of particular interest towards the Lottery Commission are player authentication and registration protocols, also as recommendations for responsible video gaming controls.

The commission also states that it is searching for ways of integrating lottery ticket retailers so that you can protect the 7,500-odd smaller businesses that depend on lottery sales commissions.

Homegrown Product

‘We believe the development of a dream sports platform at Massachusetts Lottery would help to embrace a market that is emerging continuing to protect our retail partners,’ Lottery Executive Director Michael Sweeney told the News provider recently.

‘ This type that is particular of would maybe not cannibalize our existing products. It might obviously be a product that is new. It could help us to interact that which we would refer to as a ‘next-generation’ player and hopefully it would also help Lottery generate a revenue that is new as opposed to eroding or maintaining existing offers.’

Throughout the edge in New York State, Attorney General Eric Schneiderman happens to be railing up against the ‘fraudulent’ nature of this DFS industry, but Massachusetts’ AG Maura Healey has declared there are no federal or state rules that preclude such sites from operating.

Healy has proposed full regulation of DFS, drawing up protocols to protect consumers, and has stated that state residents who play DFS should ‘not be concerned’ which they are breaking the law.

In the end, there’s nothing wrong with embracing only a little local innovation, and DraftKings, created and bred in Boston, is perhaps benefitting from being a homegrown success story.

India Supreme Court Panel Recommends Legalizing Sports Betting

Former India Supreme Court Justice Rajendra Mal Lodha is recommending that the national nation legalize cricket betting and gambling in order to crackdown on corruption. (Image: The Hindu)

Asia is one step closer to legalizing activities betting and gambling after having a panel appointed by the nation’s Supreme Court recommended modifying the longstanding gaming ban in order to combat a growing epidemic of illegal wagering.

Home to over 1.2 billion people, India is the second-most populated country in the world.

Now three lawmakers, previous Chief Justice Rajendra Mal Lodha, along with retired Justices Ashok Bhan and RV Raveendran, opined to your Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) that legalized recreations wagering would offer more transparency and cut down on rogue backdoor wagering.

‘It [betting] would provide both the game and economy if legalized,’ Lodha told reporters on adding that the market should be opened, but only with extensive safeguards in place to ensure that players and those with direct ties to sports matches are barred from participating monday.

2013 Scandal

Last January, India’s Supreme Court formed the panel, with Lodha serving as chairman, in response to the 2013 Indian Premier League match-fixing scandal that rocked the sport and dominated headlines.

Though the sport of cricket is no stranger to controversy, the events of 2013 had been unprecedented.

The investigation that is lengthy Delhi Police led to charges against 39 individuals and two-year suspensions for the Rajasthan Royals and Chennai Super Kings cricket teams.

The match-fixing that is widespread unlawful wagering led the BCCI to take steps to improve its infrastructure and look for methods to mend its moral standing.

The acts that are criminal led to intervention by the Supreme Court and Lodha’s panel concluding that BCCI and India should embrace a controlled gambling market to eradicate illegal betting systems and precisely monitor players and officials.

BCCI Unlikely to Embrace New Vision

Cricket is the most popular task in India, and while the sport’s governing body claims it wants to clean its league up, the federal government might not be so wanting to closing gambling prohibition.

Apart from horse racing, gambling in India happens to be illegal for nearly 150 years.

In addition to proposing cricket that is legal, Lodha’s outline also suggests changing the BCCI’s energy structure and organization from top to bottom. The BCCI has remained mum on the Lodha report up to now.

The choice to authorize gaming and sports betting doesn’t reside with the BCCI; that task goes to officials on their state and levels that are federal.

‘ The federal government will probably keep it alone as it remains a contentious issue,’ Asia Bet Managing Director George Oborne told eGaming Review.

Gambling has mostly been a states’ liberties topic over the full years, but of the nation’s 29 states and seven territories, just three took steps to expand the industry: Goa, Daman, and Sikkim.

Though gambling can provide substantial revenues and monies for local governments, many in India believe any expansion of gambling additionally leads to an expansion in crime, corruption, and money laundering.

Lodha argues gambling’s currently there, albeit illegally, and that swift action should be taken.

‘With big cash and attention, there will not be the caution that is necessary protect the game and its particular players from the orgy of excess,’ he stated.

2nd PokerStars Boycott Struggles to Make Impact After First Effort Fizzled

Ike Haxton, whom resigned on New Year’s Day as a PokerStars professional in protest at the changes to the VIP system. (Image:

A 2nd PokerStars boycott by high-stakes and high-variance players is apparently neglecting to create a discernible dent, at least on the site’s traffic numbers.

Around 1,600 players enrolled in the protest, according to organizers.

Per industry number-cruncher, while traffic dipped on January 1st, the initial day’s the attack, it actually rose on January 2nd, when comparing to the same day the previous week, while Sunday, January 3rd remained on par with figures from the same day the previous week.

Of course, it’s impossible to know simply how much the dearth that is sudden of stakes players is affecting PokerStars’ daily rake, and whether all the players whom pledged to sit out have in reality proved true to their word.

The boycott, which is due to get club player casino coupon rid of Thursday, January 7th, has been organized by a number of groups that is including, also an amount of high-profile, high stakes players on the 2+2 forums, in protest towards a major overhaul to the VIP system, which took impact on January 1st.

PokerStars announced in November that these changes would consist of scrapping Supernova Elite rewards for 2016, despite the achievement with this status being a process that is two-year.

Boycott Backfired?

PokerStars claims that the modifications are created to improve the poker ecology, nevertheless they leave high-stakes, high-volume players high and dry.

While these players represent some of your website’s most avid, long-term, and high-ranking players, they are net-withdrawing players as opposed to the hordes of net-depositors that the on-line poker giant is anxious to attract.

The first boycott took place between December 1st and 3rd, with 2,600 players joining in the sit out. But that occasion clashed with the PokerStars Christmas Festival, so traffic figures remained comparable, except that those high-stakes players were replaced with lower stakes players attracted by low buy-ins and jackpot awards.

While PokerStars is likely to have raked less throughout that period, it declared itself vindicated by the December boycott.

‘During the three-day boycott we recorded the healthiest consecutive three-day ecosystem link between the year with steady net gaming revenue, despite the fact that our net-depositing players lost at a much lower rate than they have all 12 months,’ wrote Eric Hollreiser, VP of Communications for PokerStars and Amaya.

More Boycotts Planned

The affected players remain undeterred, however, and are determined showing PokerStars which they can make the operator’s life difficult.

And much more boycotts are planned in the future. has launched a campaign looking for 5,000 signatures to accept at least a strike that is month-long while other protestors have suggested that a 10,000-player boycott could reduce PokerStars’ rake by just as much as 30 percent.

On New Year’s time, Ike Haxton became the second high-profile PokerStars Pro to resign in disgust at the changes, after the exemplory instance of Alex Millar, who severed ties with the site just before the vacation duration.

‘As a four time Supernova Elite, I am aware what it requires to rake 1M VPP in a ‘ wrote haxton on 2+2 year. ‘It’s a grind that is tough. For many of the players that do it, it is an all-consuming dedication more intense than most full time jobs.

‘Many of these have relocated far from their homes and families to pursue it,’ he included. ‘Finding out, just while you expected them to be is brutal as you approach the finish line, that your efforts will not be rewarded. We cannot in good conscience carry on to endorse a poker web site that treats its players this real way.’