Council gm offered sa council contract
The report said the government had signed two contracts to provide «compensation for potential losses incurred» during the redevelopment of the property, and that one contract had previously been awarded to a non-profit.
«The first contract was awarded on the basis that Savelio could not afford to repair the damages as it was expected that, if the property was redeveloped, the price would increase significantly and the value of the property would plummet,» the report said.
«While there are risks involved in the awarding of these contracts, in this case the potential costs did not outweigh the benefits. The바카라 second contract, which the Government has awarded, is an extension of the second and third c바카라사이트ontracts, which should now be completed.»
But the report said the «excessive compensation awarded in this contract has been, as a result, increasing Savelio’s debt».
The report also noted the costs of Savelio’s work had been «subject to cost overruns and delays, resulting in an increased potential for potential loss».
It said the council was under no circumstances being forced to make a decision about whether to proceed with the plan.
The report also highlighted that a separate legal challenge has been made by the owner of an Adelaide football club against the council for compensation.
Topics: human-interest, community-and-society, sa, adelaide-500우리카지노0, sa